10/3/2006
Gil "whoo hoo" S. says:
I enjoy Zuni, Slanted Door, A16, Deflina, and Foreign Cinema more, and I'm more likely to visit, but they just aren't at the same level as Michael Minna, Aqua, or French Laundry.
As other point out Michelin is French / Euro-centric and gives short shrift to Asian restaurants -- they try to include one and they come up with a middling sushi joint in Marin.
That's fine by me. People who don't know ethnic cuisine shouldn't claim to be authorities. The local papers are offbase when they try to proclaim the best burrito, papusas, or sushi. Michelin would only embarass itself, and spread white people ignorance, if it tried.
Even within the French trend Michelin stresses objective food and service quality, not value, overall experience, sense of place, and innovation. Nothing is completely objective, and they make mistakes, but their list is up there with the Chronicle's as far as ranking the very best restaurants.
In most cities it's hard to get reliable information, drowned out as it is amidst places like Citysearch, Where Magazine, SF Magazine, the ads, the free weeklies. That's where Michelin comes in, and Frommer's, Conde Naste, and Yelp. You get the real scoop.
The main problem I have is that it carries too much authority. It's like having a European classical music professor proclaim the greatest music in the world. You get a bunch of people thinking the world started and ended with Beethoven, ignoring African music, blues, pop, what have you.
In a sense, it's great that they come to SF and validate us as a food town. But in another, it could limit people's expectations, locals but especially tourists.
Anyway, I don't think SF has anything to worry about. We're world famous for food, wine, the bridge, and fog. We've already hyped our food, just like we hype eveyrthing else bout California, perhaps to the point of being overrated.
Here's the next idea. Let's have the Yelp guide to pho. We'll go all over Europe to find the best pho joints.