7/10/2006
Gil "whoo hoo" S. says:
Alicia, the problem is you're using common sense and this is the law. Landlords cannot kick tenants out in three days, more like a couple months if they're totally unresponsive and several more than that if they fight back with or without justification. The website link discusses this in some detail so I won't repeat. In any area of law it's a mistake to intuit that you have a symmetrial right break an agreement due to a perceived breach by the other side, because in most cases that's not true. At that point it comes down to strategy anyway, not legal rights.
There's a word for threatening to report someone else's lawbreaking in order to prevent them from asserting their legal rights against you -- extortion. Also sometimes called blackmail. Nasty game when you think about it, really.
I don't mean to blow anything out of proportion. If you want to go ahead and break a lease you can go ahead and break a lease. Then you're in breach, which isn't like you likked a baby seal or something, it's just a broken contract. The law, and/or the lease agreement, has a procedure for figuring out who owes what to whom in that event, and as everywhere in life there are practical realities and not just legal principles. Whether you do it becuase you want to, need to, or aren't happy with the place usually doesn't matter, although you can sometimes blow a landlord's failings up into an excuse to leave or at least an offset to the money that you would owe the landlord.]
Landlords are often petty, cheap, difficult, and shady, and so are tenants. It's one of those races to the bottom, especially if you're not dealing with reputable people.